Under editor evaluation status date change

144 inch sawmill blade

Mar 27, 2020 · The change is the most wide-ranging payer acknowledgement of PTs as qualified telehealth providers to date, and it moves UHC well past CMS' and a few other payers’ current waivers allowing for limited "e-visit" digital communications between PTs and patients. About Question Types Qualtrics provides over 100 different ways to ask a question. There are 23 question types and a variety of settings that can be used Trade Secrets of the Submission Process May 31, 2016 Image: Frances Pepper and Elizabeth Smith work in the offices of The Suffragist, the weekly journal published by the Congressional Union and National Woman's Party from 1913 to 1921 - Harris & Ewing, photographers (via Library of Congress) It could be either the editor or one of the reviewers. It is possible that one reviewer has submitted his/her comments which is why the status date changed. But the status did not change as the other reviewers' comments are still pending. The status will change only when all the reviews have come in. Mar 27, 2020 · The change is the most wide-ranging payer acknowledgement of PTs as qualified telehealth providers to date, and it moves UHC well past CMS' and a few other payers’ current waivers allowing for limited "e-visit" digital communications between PTs and patients. The final decision is taken by the EiC. This is when the status changes to "decision in process." Thus, to put it simply, "under editor evaluation" means that the paper is with the AE, while "decision in process" indicates that it is with the EiC. INITIAL PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION — Once a determination is made that noncardiac surgery will be considered, the patient should be evaluated for the risk of a cardiovascular complication. This evaluation is generally performed by a primary care clinician. The information obtained is used to assess risk. Feb 06, 2016 · In usual cases, a "Decision in process" means that the editor of the journal has received the reviewer comments from all the referees. The chief editor now has to make the decision as to whether he will accept/reject your paper or ask you to revis... To date, the culture change movement has largely been provider-driven without major government involvement. However, if culture change is ultimately shown to offer greater value relative to the traditional nursing home model, policymakers might consider the adoption of policies to further encourage this model. After this status, the editor send the recommendations made by the reviewers. This time depends on the journal. In my case, after the change for the 'under editor evaluation' status, it took lass than 1 week to receive the e-mail from the editor with the reviewer's recommendations. In the end, this status is a good thing. Judging from the 'last activity date' two reviews were back within about 2 weeks but we were left waiting for 6 weeks. Upon our inquiry the editor decided to go with the reviews at hand -- then the manuscript remained "under evaluation" for a month before the decision. Dec 06, 2016 · Under Editor Evaluationとはどういう状態をさしていますか。 Elsevier Journalへ論文投稿を行いました。 約2週間のunder review期間を経過した後にUnder Editor Evaluationというstatusになりました。 Existing active substance The Review Programme is the name commonly used for the work programme for the examination of existing biocidal active substances contained in biocidal products. The programme was set up by the European Commission under the Biocidal Products Directive (BPD) and continues under the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR). To date, the culture change movement has largely been provider-driven without major government involvement. However, if culture change is ultimately shown to offer greater value relative to the traditional nursing home model, policymakers might consider the adoption of policies to further encourage this model. the Editor of another journal (obviously the last place the paper was rejected). Strike One! …suggest potential referees (up to 5 or 6) and a member of the Editorial Board Of course it is the Editor’s prerogative to assign referees, but the reality is that journal staff members are overworked. Answer: If the status date changes, but the status remains the same, it indicates that the Editor has accessed the database to check your manuscript. There could be several reasons behind this. The editor could have accessed the database to download the manuscript for the initial editorial screening. Jul 07, 2008 · The Office of Public Affairs (OPA) is the single point of contact for all inquiries about the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). We read every letter, fax, or e-mail we receive, and we will convey your comments to CIA officials outside OPA as appropriate. Judging from the 'last activity date' two reviews were back within about 2 weeks but we were left waiting for 6 weeks. Upon our inquiry the editor decided to go with the reviews at hand -- then the manuscript remained "under evaluation" for a month before the decision. Jan 21, 2011 · Ah, the old phantom status date change. I have had this happen to me before and don’t know why. I suspect it is driven by an editor-side status change (e.g. the editor inviting a new reviewer) which remains invisible to us on the author-side. Reply ↓ Tracking the Status of a Manuscript. Further developments in the online submission process help journals provide authors with access to manuscript tracking systems, which allow them to follow the status of a manuscript as it goes through the review process, post submission. Jan 21, 2011 · Ah, the old phantom status date change. I have had this happen to me before and don’t know why. I suspect it is driven by an editor-side status change (e.g. the editor inviting a new reviewer) which remains invisible to us on the author-side. Reply ↓ Dear Editor, The response letter entitled “Authors’ response to letter to the Editor: Safety concerns with human papilloma virus immunization in Japan: Analysis and evaluation of Nagoya City's surveillance data for adverse events” (Yaju & Tsubaki, 2019b) is extremely disappointing since the authors did not admit their biased analyses and insisted their fairness including the ... Feb 06, 2016 · In usual cases, a "Decision in process" means that the editor of the journal has received the reviewer comments from all the referees. The chief editor now has to make the decision as to whether he will accept/reject your paper or ask you to revis... Jan 21, 2011 · Ah, the old phantom status date change. I have had this happen to me before and don’t know why. I suspect it is driven by an editor-side status change (e.g. the editor inviting a new reviewer) which remains invisible to us on the author-side. Reply ↓ 9 To further illustrate, we note the Third Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Tenafly Eruv Ass'n v. Borough of Tenafly, 309 F.3d 144 (3d Cir. 2002).In Tenafly, the Third Circuit applied the endorsement test to the question of whether a town would violate the Establishment Clause if it allowed a group of Orthodox Jews to attach markers to utility poles for religious reasons. To extend the test period or to use Windows 10 without activation, you can continue to use the slmgr -rearm even with Windows 10 Home and Pro! But, currently the trial period extension is under Windows 10 not required! Content: Solutions 1.) ... Extend trial test period on Windows 10! 2.) ... Does windows 10 have rearm count? After this status, the editor send the recommendations made by the reviewers. This time depends on the journal. In my case, after the change for the 'under editor evaluation' status, it took lass than 1 week to receive the e-mail from the editor with the reviewer's recommendations. In the end, this status is a good thing. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of template include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of template serve different purposes. Sep 16, 2013 · How to edit status to change case Dave Todaro Sep 16, 2013 I inadvertently typed "Ready for TEst" when creating a new column on my agile board and the resulting new status is now showing as "Ready for TEst" throughout JIRA. services within each APC group and the APC assignments under the OPPS. As stated in the CY 2020 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period, as a result of our annual review of the services and the APC assignments under the OPPS, we finalized the addition of two new C-APCs under the existing C-APC payment policy effective January 1, 2020. The new C ... Feb 06, 2016 · In usual cases, a "Decision in process" means that the editor of the journal has received the reviewer comments from all the referees. The chief editor now has to make the decision as to whether he will accept/reject your paper or ask you to revis... Answer: If the status date changes, but the status remains the same, it indicates that the Editor has accessed the database to check your manuscript. There could be several reasons behind this. The editor could have accessed the database to download the manuscript for the initial editorial screening. Nov 22, 2015 · Short answer - no. Long answer - Publishers are bombarded with manuscripts, and each has their own way of evaluating them. A rejection is a fast process - writer did not rewrite and supplied a first draft, draft not polished, writer submitted uns... If they come then status may change to "with editor" or "under editor evaluation" or "required reviews completed". Under these status also the status date may change which implies remaining reviewer(s) have also submitted their reports.